August 16, 2006
Panasonic Lumix L1 previewed
The new Panasonic L1 has been previewed by Reponses Photo (excellent French print magazine). As they say, on paper, a collaboration between the makers of the Lumix compacts, Leica and Olymous should be something special. But they're disappointed. Whilst they are quite enthusiastic about the general concept, the build quality, and the degree of control, there are a series of downsides.
- The "Live View" feature simply isn't as useful as the version on the Olympus E-330, mainly because the screen is fixed. However, unlike on the E-330, apparently you can use auto-focus without restrictions.
- The optical viewfinder is dark and cramped, and the physical design, which sticks out 1cm at the back, is simply asking to be damaged. They reckon that the eyecup will be lost within days.
- The handling is a bit clumsy, as balance, with the kit lens attached, is front heavy. Which exacerbates the viewfinder design issue.
- The "Leica" kit lens is interesting, but the aperture ring is awkward to use, it is very heavy, and whilst its performance is good, it does not meet the expectations associated with Leica.
- The camera is very expensive, twice the price of the E-330, which they consider to be a better camera on balance.
- Still stuck with that rather tired old Olympus AF module
- Did I mention too expensive ?
On the plus side:
- Panasonic provide Silkypix RAW software rather than reinvent the wheel (poorly), although arguably it would have been better to also use DNG format.
- The lens isn't all bad: as RP points out, this is the first stabilized zoom lens from any company with a decent maximum aperture.
- They describe the flash design as "genius": it has two positions, the first pointing 45 degrees upwards for bounce flash.
- The image quality is reported to be good up to 800 ISO.
- The camera also includes 3:2 and 16:9 ratio setiings, and this is where Panasonic's implementation of Live View adds an extra dimension. But of course these sacrifice resolution.
At half the price, well, maybe. But at 2000 Euros, though, it looks like Panasonic have screwed up this one. Pity.
Recent Entries
Gallery Update
Carl Zeiss Helsinki
Wisdom of crowds ?
Gallery Update
Gallery Update
Full of stars
Antarctica Video
Gallery Update
Iceland 2007 Calendar
The calendar season
Practical Photography
Arizona Hogwash
Ed Burtynsky video
Rub me RAW
Flying Blind
Shell Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Aperture - finally we can try it
Gallery Update
Panasonic more marketable than Leica ?
For your browsing pleasure
Gallery Update
Olympus E-400 and other things
At last ...Gallery Update
Moonmadness
Quattroterziphoto
Home again
Scattered areas of availability
Real World Sharpening
Whistling in the wind
Conflicting opinions
Gallery Update
Lightroom Podcasts
Panasonic Lumix L1 previewed
Web site updates
A RAW Workflow
'ere we go, 'ere we go, etc
The Lightroom Shuffle
Gallery Update
The Canary Project
Bucharest 2006: a photo essay
Carl Zeiss Helsinki
Wisdom of crowds ?
Gallery Update
Gallery Update
Full of stars
Antarctica Video
Gallery Update
Iceland 2007 Calendar
The calendar season
Practical Photography
Arizona Hogwash
Ed Burtynsky video
Rub me RAW
Flying Blind
Shell Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Aperture - finally we can try it
Gallery Update
Panasonic more marketable than Leica ?
For your browsing pleasure
Gallery Update
Olympus E-400 and other things
At last ...Gallery Update
Moonmadness
Quattroterziphoto
Home again
Scattered areas of availability
Real World Sharpening
Whistling in the wind
Conflicting opinions
Gallery Update
Lightroom Podcasts
Panasonic Lumix L1 previewed
Web site updates
A RAW Workflow
'ere we go, 'ere we go, etc
The Lightroom Shuffle
Gallery Update
The Canary Project
Bucharest 2006: a photo essay
Categories